This was first posted at PINAC, and in the past I would have commented on it there, but I’m no longer interacting there, so I am posting it here.
In the video, a police officer with an unknown police department† claims that Lanessa Espinosa is a “jailhouse lawyer” because she actually knows what the law says. She pointed out that she did not have to identify herself unless she was “being charged.” At that point Corpus Christi Senior Officer‡ J.E. Lockhart comes up and demands ID and tells her that he will arrest her if she doesn’t provide ID.
The problem is that § 38.02, Texas Penal Code, does not authorize an arrest for failure to ID on a mere detention unless the person provides a fictitious name. We’ve covered that several times, here, here, here, here (also in Corpus), here, here, here, and here.
There are several things wrong with the video. First, the officer from the unknown department is choking Espinosa with an arm-bar choke hold. If you look at the video at 1:12, you’ll see the officer’s forearm cutting directly over Espinosa’s adam’s apple in the same manner that killed Eric Garner in New York. The arm-bar choke hold is almost universally viewed as deadly force, and completely inappropriate here when the crime is at best, a misdemeanor under the officer’s mistaken idea of the law.
Second, it is a false arrest. Even more so, it is an arrest because she is exercising her right not to provide identification when he knows (or should have known) that the arrest is unlawful, and that he intentionally denied her of her freedom when he knew (or should have known) that his conduct was unlawful. Folks, that the definition of Official Oppression, § 39.03, Texas Penal Code, and is a Class A misdemeanor.††
I can almost guarantee that Chief Floyd Simpson will not follow up on this. Recently he kept an officer on the department after the officer assaulted a handcuffed prisoner in the jail. That officer got a two-week suspension and was allowed to retire.
Anyway, if you want to waste your time, you can contact the department:
- Chief Floyd Simpson (FloydS@cctexas.com), 361-886-2600.
- Internal Affairs, 361-886-2627.
†We know it is not a sheriff’s office because the patch says “Police” just above the state seal. I believe that it is probably going to be some type of park ranger or park police for several reasons. One, the uniform, except for the patch, is much the same as the TPWD park ranger uniform. Second, the badge appears to be round, which is the normal shape for a state agency, although some county agencies also use a round badge.
‡In Corpus, for some reason, the sergeants are called “senior officer” although they wear sergeant stripes on their collar.
††Punishable by up to a $4,000 fine and/or up to 1 year in the county jail.
OK, the first officer in the khaki shirt is an investigator from the Nueces County DA’s Office. Second, they detained Espinosa for Interference with Public Duties, § 38.15, Texas Penal Code. She was not arrested, but was released at the scene. A very quick check of the annotations leaves it unclear if this would be a valid charge or not, but I don’t have the time to research it thoroughly. My initial impression is that this is BS, but without a case directly on point, they can probably skate on Official Oppression.
Next, the NCDA (Mark Skurka) is investigating the use of the chokehold by the officer. You’ll probably never hear what the result is, and there will likely be no disciplinary action taken. You can contact the DA’s Office at 361-888-0410 or at email@example.com. BTW, this was an off-duty job for the officer, DA investigators are normally in plain clothes.
Corpus Christi issued a press release absolving their officer of all responsibility and stating how they were committed to transparency and allow people to videotape or film. All of that is nice, but it misses the point. There were no grounds to require identification, as state law did not require it. Espinosa took no actions other than to verbally assert her rights, in other words, speech only. Finally, the press release noted how CCPD officers were trained to “be respectful” and to use “de-escalation techniques.” Really? That’s what they call respect and de-escalation? I would hate to see what is disrespectful and escalating.