In a post at a great blog, Photography is Not a Crime (PINAC), there is a video of a San Diego, California police officer issuing a citation to for smoking on the boardwalk. The officer tells the person, Adam Pringle, to put the cellphone up because it could be a weapon.
This is a long-time police myth, which unfortunately has some basis in fact.
In 2000 or 2001, police in Europe discovered a four-shot gun disguised as a cellphone. Since then police officers in the United States have claimed on multiple occasions that civilians who were recording video with their cellphones had to put the phone down. Why? Because it could be a weapon.
Geez, guys, you’re killing us. There have been no cellphone guns recovered in the United States, according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives. None. Zero. Nada. Zilch.
In addition, there are exactly zero court cases that discuss the issue. As a matter of fact, there is nothing in the legal world that discuss the issue. No law review articles, no trial or appellate briefs, nothing.
Other camouflaged weapons have been found. See United States v. Beal, 810 F.2d 574 (4th Cir. 1987) (officers found two .22 cal. pen guns during search); State v. Slockbower, 368 A.2d 388 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1976), rev’d on other grounds 397 A.2d 1050 (N.J. 1979) (officer found .22 cal. pen gun in glove compartment); People v. Varnell, 370 N.E.2d 145 (Ill. App. Ct. 1977) (cane gun used in aggravated battery); United States v. Winslow, 76 F.3d 390 (9th Cir. 1995) (wallet gun found during search incident to arrest).
How many times have the officers used force when a subject reached for his pen to sign a ticket, or produced his driver’s license, or used a cane?
This appears to be solely a case of not wanting to be filmed and using force to stop the filming.
Difdi
Apr 10, 2013 @ 01:14:11
Whenever I hear a story like this, I wonder to myself whether that excuse would fly (or crash and burn) if a non-police citizen used it. Citizens and police have the same right to self-defense after all, police just have a duty to investigate/advance that citizens generally lack.
Would an officer who likes to claim that safety trumps everything agree with a citizen who acted on the same argument and made the same excuse? I doubt it.
Ken Bankers
Apr 10, 2013 @ 08:33:18
I would say not Due to the “class restrictions” that this country has put on its people. As far as being able to defend your self i have seen people go to jail for shooting someone who broke into their home. I wouldnt put it past these so called People of authority to try something worse sooner or latter.
What You Need to Know About Filming, Photographing Police in Public | CfpDir.com
Apr 18, 2013 @ 08:32:18
What You Need to Know About Filming, Photographing Police in Public
Apr 18, 2013 @ 08:45:54
What You Need to Know About Filming, Photographing Police in Public
Apr 18, 2013 @ 09:21:50
THE BLAZE by LIZ KLIMAS « How Did We Get Here
Apr 18, 2013 @ 10:13:58
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT FILMING, PHOTOGRAPHING POLICE IN PUBLIC
Apr 18, 2013 @ 19:55:34
keith hanks mini coop
Apr 20, 2013 @ 23:46:12
Great website you have here but I was wondering if you knew of
any user discussion forums that cover the same topics discussed in this article?
I’d really like to be a part of group where I can get feed-back from other experienced people that share the same interest. If you have any recommendations, please let me know. Thanks!
http://www.howtododigitalphotography.net
Apr 24, 2013 @ 08:03:09
Wow, that’s what I was seeking for, what a information! existing here at this web site, thanks admin of this web site.
Newark California Police Must Also Believe in the Tooth Fairy | ExCop-LawStudent
May 08, 2013 @ 00:18:54